CNN John King ABC Brian Ross Nothing To Apologize: In November, I made a CNN debate with a piece hoping out loud that Wolf Blitzer would not let him bully as Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House had done to others debate moderators.Here ‘s a little’ of what I wrote: So is that I will come to TV tonight hoping to see one of the few anchors who has the stature and credibility to call Gingrich’s candidate to take his game forward to bluster fake pounding as a moderator of the press saying “stupid “of his favorite words or” wrong “another favorite word their questions are.Blitzer that civilization is a journalist prizes and even arrogance in its management of interviews, which is another reason could be one of the few who can challenge Gingrich to answer the questions asked of him instead of trying to use the stage to direct a dishonest attack on the press.
Gingrich played great that night, but it was only to save his mock indignation of the game for a stadium as big as the one he had on Thursday in South Carolina, who used to go after ABC News, CNN and moderator John King tongs.I hammer and walked away from the TV last night outraged, outraged so I knew I had to write until I have thought more about what disppasionately saw.After a night of reflection, I say this with absolute clarity and conviction: John King and CNN has done absolutely no need to apologize Thursday night. In my opinion, the king did something wrong. I’ll arrive in a minute.

And that is why, even Brian Ross and ABC do anything that should apologize to interview Gingrich’s second wife who says her then husband asked for an “open marriage” so that he could continue his affair with the woman who now is his third wife. I do not care if it’s two days before the vote in South Caroloina. ABC News, Gingrich has given a lot of time to respond and chose to do so in the stage of an attack to the press Thursday night.Not not only CNN, King, ABC and Ross do anything that warrants an apology, were absolutely doing the work of journalism in vetting a presidential candidate and give her / him the opportunity to respond to their findings.
People like Rush Limbaugh who say Gingrich, the former ex wife and his second wife claims “are out there” and have not been re-visited today by a vote looming primary are dead wrong. It ‘a good time to re-visit because there is a job looming.The vote of the press is to make the voters know as much as possible about a candidate when they go to the polls and no one should take anything for granted, as what voters know or do not know. And by the way, the news organization that gets the interview comes when it wants to air until there is time for all parties to answer who cares if it’s a Tuesday or a Thursday night?

Personally, I did not know that half of the details Gingrich’s ex-wife (his second ex-wife) alleged on how horribly he treated after the diagnosis of MS. And I thought I knew more or less on this poster boy for the absorption of self-indulgence and grandiose delusions.CNN and ABC News did not invent the enmity of Gingrich’s ex-wife’s second ex-wife for him, the former Speaker of the House who has spent months attacking President Bill Clinton at the expense of the work of Congress, while he himself carried on an affair, he did everything himself.
And now, Gingrich wants to be to hold press conferences and the nation about what is “despicable” and what is not as it did at the very beginning of the debate last night. He wants to say how “troubled” is that “CNN would take junk like that and use it to open a presidential debate.” The “junk” you refer to is the allegation made by his wife, formerly the second ex-wife who wanted an “open marriage” so that he could continue his adultery with the staff that is his current wife. His words speak directly to issues of hypocrisy, Gingrich and character.
And all the king did was give the opportunity to respond to what it was all over the media as part interview Thursday, ABC News aired at 11:30 Thursday evening on “Nightline” have been eaten up by news agencies all day Gingrich. There is a piece for another day here as to the role played by Matt Drudge to do an interview that proved so disappointing as an event awaited and much discussed in the media.
I could go on for a week about the folly of placing itself as the arbiter of morality Gingrich media, but news cycles being what they are, here is the part I need to hit: The reaction Planet Bizarro in some places to what happened on the Last night: The people acting as Gingrich has done something good, and the king did something bad.I get attacks of the conservatives’ on King, CNN, ABC News and Ross. These attacks are laced with ideological madness that goes back to Joe McCarthy and runs through the staright-Dan Rather, Richard Nixon Compare up to the present and Fox News. Which by the way, is another institution that had a piece of Gingrich as its president until he had literally kicked out of Gingrich’s payroll last year.
But the New Republic, for example, has a piece online now king in the opening discussion of the debate so that the CNN reporter did. After some of his problems, you might think TNR would be one of the latest publications on earth to enter into a discussion of thesis multimedia behavior.King ‘s that is formed as a journalist for Associated Press and was socilaized the belief that “a Lede History is the Lede, “is a good compromise. It goes hand in hand with the “elephant in the room”, an argument that Gingrich, the former wife was the topic on everyone’s mind Thursday, so let’s deal with it right off the bat is out of the way and move the debate and full the major issues that affect everyone as THE ECONOMY.I do not think there is a honest newswoman or journalist in America who can argue with any of these defenses. Source